This building is on a boarding school campus. 100% of students live on campus and cannot keep cars there, so they have no choice but to get to the building by foot. We therefore excluded them from our calculation of required bike storage. The preliminary review says this doesn't meet the credit intent and says we need to account for students in our calculation. I don't understand why. My impression was that the credit intent was to reduce car travel. Thoughts?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.