FAQs about EAp2 :

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Baseline Design Air Flow - System 5

The project we are modeling belongs to System 5. There is however no cooling needed or designed. The system also are not like system 9, because it is mainly manufacturing area and an administration compartment with offices, etc.

As per G3.1.2.8 the example there for a temperature difference of 20OF applies presumably for cooling, because in heating mode with such a temp. difference there are lots of unmet hours. Is it OK if we apply the principle of System 9 whereby if needed to increase the supply air temperature so that to eliminate the unmet load hours.

Your assistance is highly appreciated.

Thanks.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 11/08/2017 - 15:34

In this case we would probably still model it as a system 9. I see three choices. 1. Model system 9 and justify doing so because it is probably the most conservative choice and the one that likely compares best the proposed system. 2. Model the system 5 according to the letter of the law and also modeling cooling in both models as required by Table G3.1-10 Proposed (d). Adjust the cooling set point so that the cooling system never comes on in both models. 3. Model the system 5 without a cooling system and explain to the reviewer that you know the work around in #2 and did not wish to model a cooling system for no reason. You don't use the 20 degree delta T with a system 9 just use the 105 degree supply air temperature.

Wed, 11/08/2017 - 18:56

Hi Marcus, Thanks for the reply. Actully I've been applying what you've suggested in item 2. Also I've been trying to use 105 degree supply temperature. What I was not quite sure is, if I could use higher than 105 temperature in case there will be unmet load hours. Thanks

Wed, 11/08/2017 - 19:05

For unmet load hours you have to increase the system capacity as described in G3.1.2.2.

Wed, 11/08/2017 - 19:22

Do you mean to increase the capacity of the Baseline (because the unmet hours are there) by more than 25% as stated in G3.1.2.2.

Wed, 11/08/2017 - 19:48

Yes. When modeling a system 5 the supply air temperature is 20 degress less than your inflated cooling set point. So just increase the set point until the cooling system does not operate and then you have no cooling related unmet load hours. This can get messy due to the reheat in the system related to the supply air temperature from the 20 degree delta T, which is why we suggest modeling a system 9. That and it is just way easier and would be an acceptable method in our opinion.

Wed, 11/08/2017 - 19:54

Thanks a lot Marcus. Really appreciated

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.