FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Basecase Building Envelope

Our project is G+3 factory building and it is a major renovation and we are renovated wall, window, HVAC equipment and we consider ASHRAE 90.1.2007 Building envelope for base case & renovated building envelope for proposed case now the LEED reviewer ask to consider the existing building envelope before renovation for basecase and renovated building envelope for proposed case 1. What is the wrong in considering the ASHRAE 90.1.2007 building envelope for Basecase (Additionally we have more saving in HVAC or considering existing building envelope before renovation for basecase but we don't need that advantage ) 2.please advice how to address below review command for the above situation Review Comments "it does not appear that the existing envelope conditions prior to retrofit were modeled consistent with the requirements of ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Table G3.1#5(Baseline)(f). For all envelope assemblies located in spaces that were conditioned prior to retrofit, model the Baseline Case envelope U-factors, SHGCs, and F-factors using the existing conditions prior to retrofit. Ensure that separate reports are provided for the existing renovation versus new construction envelope assemblies in the Table 1.4 spreadsheet for both the Baseline and Proposed Case and clearly identify the existing assemblies where energy efficient renovations have been made."

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Thu, 12/22/2016 - 15:57

As long as you can make the case that the results are conservative (less savings) the reviewer should accept it.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.