Had anyone successfully used as-built drawings to verify the installation date of water fixtures? On this page, the Checklist states that,
"Formal authentication of the fixture upgrade can be met using copies of construction permits, substantial completion notices, contract excerpts, plumbing inspection reports, commissioning reports, or similar documentation."
As-built drawings are not specifically listed here, but it seems like they would actually be one of the most reliable forms of authentication.
Jason Franken
Sustainability ProfessionalLEEDuser Expert
608 thumbs up
September 13, 2011 - 10:07 am
As long as the as-built drawing is dated after January 1, 1993, that seems like it should be an acceptable piece of documentation to verify that the prerequisite requirements are met.
David Mortensen
4 thumbs up
September 13, 2011 - 1:40 pm
Thanks for the reply Jason.
Another question: Is the cut-off Jan.1, 1993 or Jan. 1, 1994? The reference guide uses language such as "completed in 1993 or later" and "completed before 1993" implying that the important date is Jan. 1, 1993. However, on this site the language reads "in 1994 or later" and "pre-1994" implying that Jan. 1, 1994 is the cut-off. Which is correct?
Tristan Roberts
RepresentativeVermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
11477 thumbs up
December 16, 2011 - 11:12 pm
David, the Reference Guide as published in 2009 has been updated by LEED addenda reflected in our language above. So it's the 1994 date.
Emily Catacchio
Sustainability SpecialistWight and Company
610 thumbs up
December 17, 2011 - 7:56 pm
David,To add to Tristan's comment, your project only needs to adhere to the addendas which were dated prior to your registration date. You can search for this specific change on the USGBC site, here. Depending on when your project was registered it would be either 1993 or 1994.