Dear all,
While following LEED v4 EA Minimum Energy Performance, can we use ASHRAE Standard 90.1 - 2016, as it's more stringent than the 2010 version, instead of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 - 2010?
Thanks
Forum discussion
NC-v4 EAp2: Minimum energy performance
Dear all,
While following LEED v4 EA Minimum Energy Performance, can we use ASHRAE Standard 90.1 - 2016, as it's more stringent than the 2010 version, instead of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 - 2010?
Thanks
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forTo post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5907 thumbs up
March 28, 2022 - 1:57 pm
Yes you can. If you upgrade the credit to LEED v4.1 it references 90.1-2016.
Greenlab
Green Lab6 thumbs up
March 28, 2022 - 2:06 pm
But if we want to calculate credits based on v4, but still use 2016 stringent values. Can we?
Mindaugas Mi
OwnerSOP
March 28, 2022 - 2:17 pm
You can go v4.1 for only this credit theres a button to do that. Then you can use 2016
Greenlab
Green Lab6 thumbs up
March 28, 2022 - 2:28 pm
Are we required to calculate credits following v4.1 Carbon emissions and energy consumption new methodology? or can we calculate credits according to v4, but use 90.1-2016?
Jamy Bacchus
Associate PrincipalME Engineers
25 thumbs up
March 28, 2022 - 2:36 pm
There is a path for 90.1-2013 to be used in v4, but I am unaware of any 90.1-2016 options in v4.
Is there a particular reason you want to evaluate your project exclusively on a cost-basis and not also a carbon one? Appendix G in 2016 has its share of quirks, e.g., the BPFs, gas baselines in some climate zones.