See all forum discussions about CS-v4 EQp1
 Subscribe to new posts about CS-v4 EQp1 Post a new question aboutCS-v4 EQp1
See LEEDuser’s guidance on CS-v4 EQp1»
FAQs about EQp1 :

A building has fan-assisted ventilation and no mechanical cooling system. Does this qualify as natural ventilation?

What options are available to mechanically ventilated projects outside the U.S. to meet this prerequisite?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CS-v4 EQp1:Minimum indoor air quality performance

ASHRAE 62.1 Vs UK's Building Regs Part F

Default Avatar
Fleur Baguley
Carbon Consult Limited
LEEDuser Basic Member
0 thumbs up

Hi, I'm assessing a building in the UK. I note a paragraph under the credit for 'Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance' for using other, more stringent local codes in relation to ventilation. I believe we can justify using our 'Part F' UK compliance but just wondered if anyone else had used this before? Thanks.

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 03/29/2017 - 16:21

No previous experience, but I'll note that the CEN standards are approved as an alternative path. Not sure how that relates to Part F. The burden of prove is on you to show that your method is equal.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.