Hey friends,
We are working on a project that has roughly 1,000 s.f. of roof area covered by stone ballast. I've looked at another LEEDuser post about this, but it was from 2013, so I'm hoping there's some new insight on the topic. It seems that ballast is considered by sources to be a "cool roof" material, and acceptable for reducing urban heat island (provided that the ballast has a high reflectance SRI >30).
Has anyone had any experience with using ballast towards this credit for the "area of high-reflectance roof" portion of the equation? It really doesn't make sense to ignore it, especially if there isn't enough data/ research out there proving that this design strategy is detrimental to the urban heat island effect.
Thanks for sharing any comments and/or insight!
emily reese moody
Sustainability Director, Certifications & ComplianceJacobs
LEEDuser Expert
476 thumbs up
September 25, 2023 - 7:50 pm
Hi Martin,
I would certainly include it in the roofing materials table either way, as it is the surface that is doing the reflecting. Sounds like this should work in your favor here since you actually have the reflectance info from the manufacturer/supplier and it sounds like it'd help your calcs.