The project is registered as a Campus project with a Master Site including 4 new buildings, an underground parking structure, and landscape improvements. There are a number of existing buildings within the master site boundary as well. There is going to be a new central plant supplying all the new and existing buildings. The owner has appointed 2 commissioning agents for the CxA process, one for the central plant and one for the rest of the new buildings. We are evaluating what is the best approach for documentation. We are proposing the commissioning for the central plant to be documented using the master site commissioning credit and the individual buildings to be documented on a per building basis. This will allow for the separation and autonomy of the two commissioning agents. We will be noting at the special circumstance section of the letter template to see the master site for central plant information to close the loop between the two. Is this an acceptable approach for documentation?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Scott Bowman
LEED FellowIntegrated Design + Energy Advisors, LLC
LEEDuser Expert
519 thumbs up
August 15, 2016 - 5:44 pm
This appears very reasonable. At most, you might get a question about the central plant Cx and have to provide the report in answer. Remember, I am not an employee of GBCI, but I have found that if not fully laid out, proceeding in this logical manner will bring the most success.