I suspect I know the answer to this, but I'm wondering if others have any experience with earning Regional Priority points having used an Alternate Compliance Path. Our project is pursuing Pilot Credit 83 Site Development Protect or Restore Habitat Alternative Compliance Path (which refers to the World Fish and Wildlife Fund). Our zip code includes SS 5 Protect or Restore Habitat as a Regional Priority option, but it references the core 2 options, not the ACP. Should I assume that the RP is closed to us bc we're pursuing the Pilot Credit?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.