FAQs about EAp2 :

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

90.1 compliance mandatory? Planned use of empty space?

Sorry for a couple of elementary questions, but my searches haven't been successful. 1. Is 90.1 compliance required, or only the mandatory provisions? 2. I have three floors that are empty, but planned future use is known, which will be identical to the floors above them. This future use will be designed, built, and occupied fairly soon after occupancy (maybe a year or two). I think it best to model these floors as copies of the known future layout and systems. It's sort of a gray area to me, though. Will that be OK? Thanks! Dave

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 09/28/2012 - 19:16

1. You must comply with the mandatory provisions. The remaining prescriptive provisions are all available for trade-off as long as you can meet the minimum savings requirement. 2. If it is designed and will be occupied that way then modeling that way makes sense.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.