Forum discussion
NC-2009 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performance
I strongly question this application of minimum 30% more fresh above ASHRAE Standard 62.1 for buildings in hot and humid climates like Colombo in Sri Lanka where designers on specific project insist on having this additional 30% of fresh air.
I would appreciate comments in this subject.
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forTo post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?
For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?
Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?
Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?
Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?
How do I provide a zip code for an international location?
For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?
For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?
Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?
How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?
The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?
Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?
Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?
Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?
Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?
Melissa Merryweather
DirectorGreen Consult-Asia
245 thumbs up
November 8, 2017 - 8:36 am
Precisely why this credit is optional. It should be agreed by all the stakeholders, not blindly applied to every project. The manual makes it very clear that this credit in particular involves trade-offs (including increasing energy use) and may not be ideal for every project. If your LEED consultant is insisting on this then ask why-- if it is just for accumulation of points then there may be a better way to get to that goal. I hope that helps!
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5867 thumbs up
November 8, 2017 - 10:38 am
The tradeoff is usually for an improvement in indoor air quality. There are studies that show that more fresh air can provide some benefits to the inhabitants. So I agree with Melissa you need to find out why they would like to do this.