Replace second bullet with the following:
"Environmental product declarations which conform to ISO 14025 and EN 15804 or ISO 21930 and have at least a cradle to gate scope."
LEEDuser overview
LEED is changing all the time, and every project is unique. Even seasoned professionals can miss a critical detail and lose a credit or even a prerequisite at the last minute. Our expert advice guides our LEEDuser Premium members and saves you valuable time.
Already a premium member? Log in now
Credit language
© Copyright U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. All rights reserved.
Achieve one or more of the options below, for a maximum of 2 points.
AND/OR
Structure and enclosure materials may not constitute more than 30% of the value of compliant building products. Projects with significant amounts of structural and enclosure materials may exceed the 30% limit by calculating an alternative structure and enclosure limit (See Calculations under Further Explanation).
This LEED credit (or a component of this credit) has been established as equivalent to a SITES v2 credit or component. For more information on using the equivalency as a substitution in your LEED or SITES project, see this article and guidance document.
Frequently asked questions
For the twenty products with EPDs, can I count multiple products from the same manufacturer?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
If I include a product with an EPD in Option 1, do I have to also include it in the scope of products that are part of the Option 2 calculation?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
If I include a product in the BPDO EPDs credit, do I also have to include it in the BPDO Material Ingredients credit?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
Do I have to submit the full EPD with my documentation for Option 1?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
Where can I find a list of products with EPDs?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
How do you recognize each type of EPD?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
If a company provides an EPD but it does not mention on it that it meets the ISO standards required, can we still submit it for LEED or do we need to have that verification?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
What does it cost?
On each BD+C v4 credit, LEEDuser offers the wisdom of a team of architects, engineers, cost estimators, and LEED experts with hundreds of LEED projects between then. They analyzed the sustainable design strategies associated with each LEED credit, but also to assign actual costs to those strategies.
Our tab contains overall cost guidance, notes on what “soft costs” to expect, and a strategy-by-strategy breakdown of what to consider and what it might cost, in percentage premiums, actual costs, or both.
This information is also available in a full PDF download in The Cost of LEED v4 report.
Learn more about The Cost of LEED v4 »Already a premium member? Log in now
Checklists
LEEDuser’s checklists walk you through the key action steps you need to earn a credit, including how to avoid common pitfalls and save money.
Already a premium member? Log in now
Documentation toolkit
LEEDuser’s Documentation Toolkit is loaded with calculators to help assess credit compliance, tracking spreadsheets for materials, sample templates to help guide your narratives and LEED Online submissions, and examples of actual submissions from certified LEED projects for you to check your work against. To get your plaque, start with the right toolkit.
Already a premium member? Log in now
Addenda
Replace second bullet with the following:
"Environmental product declarations which conform to ISO 14025 and EN 15804 or ISO 21930 and have at least a cradle to gate scope."
Updated calculator to display all Material content on other tabs
Removed 30% cap language
At the end of the “Requirements” section in each of the BPDO credits, change text to the following:
“Structure and enclosure materials may not constitute more than 30% of the value of compliant building products. Projects with significant amounts of structural and enclosure materials may exceed the 30% limit by calculating an alternative structure and enclosure limit (See Equation 3 under Further Explanation).”
Furthermore, add the following new section in every BPDO credit under “Further Explanation - CALCULATIONS”:
“Equation 3: Alternative Structure & Enclosure Percentage Limit for Option 2
For projects with significant amounts of structure and enclosure materials, the following calculation can be made to determine an alternative limit for the percentage of value that structure and enclosure materials can contribute to credit achievement. Note: this option is only available for projects that use the actual materials cost method (not the default cost method) to determine total project material costs.
Equation 3: Alternative Structure and Enclosure limit
Alternative Structure and Enclosure limit = (value $ of total building materials that are structural or enclosure) [divided by] (total actual materials value $)
Use the results of equation 3 to replace the 30% contribution factor limit in determining compliance with the credit.”
Revisions to the 30% cap on structure and enclosure materials.
Under 5th bullet, for the impact category formation of tropospheric ozone add unit is measure "kg O3 eq" to reflect TRACI version 2.1 so the sentence reads "formation of tropospheric ozone, in kg NOx, kg O3 eq, or kg ethene; and..."
Under 5th bullet, for the impact category formation of tropospheric ozone add unit is measure "kg O3 eq" to reflect TRACI version 2.1 so the sentence reads "formation of tropospheric ozone, in kg NOx, kg O3 eq, or kg ethene; and..."
In Table 1. Example Calculation for $500 office chair, the row “Wheels” in the column “Percentage of component meeting sustainability criteria” replace "5% with "10%" so the cell reads “10% postconsumer recycled content”
Revised location valuation factor calculations to specify that the entire product meets local criteria.
Definition of "product (permanently installed building product" revise the last sentence to say " In addition, similar products within a specification can each contribute as separate products."
In the 3rd paragraph for BD+C and 2nd paragraph for ID+C replace the 4th-7th sentences with the following: "If optional products or materials are included in cost-based credit calculations, such as Option 2 under each Building Product Disclosure and Optimization credits, they must be included consistently across all cost-based credit calculations. Additionally, if optional products and materials are included in product based calculations, such as Option 1 under each Building Product Disclosure and Optimization credits, they are not required to be included in cost-based credit calculations. However, unlike furniture, if some of these products are included in credit calculations, not all products of that type must be included."
We are a manufacturer working with a program operator in Europe to develop environmental product declarations. We are looking for clarification on applicability of Option 1: Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) that requires approved products to be third party verified (Type III) with external verification in which the manufacturer is explicitly recognized as the participant by the program operator. The EPDs that we have developed for our products with the program operator meet all LEED criteria for Type III product specific EPDs as defined by ISO standards ISO 14025, 14040 and 14044 and are consistent with PCR standard EN 15804 with the exception of being covered by a third party verification that includes external verification. Per ISO 14025 or EN 15804, there is no requirement for the product declarations to be ‘externally verified’. Our EPDs follow an independent review process per Section 8: Verification of ISO 14025 standard and includes verification of conformance to ISO 14025, 14040 and 14044 as well as PCR standards. We are looking for published clarification on eligibility of independently reviewed product-specific EPDs in LEED v4.
Type of Reporting Format
Tier
ISO 14044 compliant product-specific life cycle assessments
1
ISO 14025 and EN 15804/ISO 21930 compliant generic EPDs
2
ISO 14025 and EN 15804/ISO 21930 compliant internally verified product-specific EPDs
3
ISO 14025 and EN 15804/ISO 21930 compliant 3rd party verified product-specific EPDs
4
Can equipment and machinery in CSI divisions 11, 21-28 and other specialty divisions, including special equipment such as elevators, escalators, process equipment, and fire suppression systems contribute towards the 20 minimum number of products required in Option 1 of Building Product Disclosure and Optimization – Environmental Product Declarations, Building Product Disclosure and Optimization – Sourcing of Raw Materials, and of Building Product Disclosure and Optimization – Material Ingredients?
Yes, these products may contribute towards Option 1 of Building Product Disclosure and Optimization – Environmental Product Declarations, Building Product Disclosure and Optimization – Sourcing of Raw Materials, and of Building Product Disclosure and Optimization – Material Ingredients. Note that if these products are included in Option 1 of a credit, they are not required to be included in Option 2.
How many times can a single industry-wide (generic) EPD contribute to Option 1, Environmental Product Declarations?
A single industry-wide (generic) EPD can be used for up to 10 products listed within the industry-wide EPD, provided that each application has separately reported impacts within the EPD.
How can products contribute to earning Option 2 of the LEED v4 MR credit BPDO – Environmental Product Declarations?
In addition to the option outlined in the credit language, products that meet any of the following requirements can also contribute towards Option 2:
1. Demonstrate reduced impact with a product-specific EPD against an industry-wide generic EPD, provided the manufacturer was part of the study and the two conform to the same PCR.
2. Demonstrate reduced impact of the same product, over time, with two product-specific EPDs.
LEEDuser overview
LEED is changing all the time, and every project is unique. Even seasoned professionals can miss a critical detail and lose a credit or even a prerequisite at the last minute. Our expert advice guides our LEEDuser Premium members and saves you valuable time.
Already a premium member? Log in now
Credit language
© Copyright U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. All rights reserved.
Achieve one or more of the options below, for a maximum of 2 points.
AND/OR
Structure and enclosure materials may not constitute more than 30% of the value of compliant building products. Projects with significant amounts of structural and enclosure materials may exceed the 30% limit by calculating an alternative structure and enclosure limit (See Calculations under Further Explanation).
This LEED credit (or a component of this credit) has been established as equivalent to a SITES v2 credit or component. For more information on using the equivalency as a substitution in your LEED or SITES project, see this article and guidance document.
Frequently asked questions
For the twenty products with EPDs, can I count multiple products from the same manufacturer?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
If I include a product with an EPD in Option 1, do I have to also include it in the scope of products that are part of the Option 2 calculation?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
If I include a product in the BPDO EPDs credit, do I also have to include it in the BPDO Material Ingredients credit?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
Do I have to submit the full EPD with my documentation for Option 1?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
Where can I find a list of products with EPDs?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
How do you recognize each type of EPD?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
If a company provides an EPD but it does not mention on it that it meets the ISO standards required, can we still submit it for LEED or do we need to have that verification?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
Documentation toolkit
LEEDuser’s Documentation Toolkit is loaded with calculators to help assess credit compliance, tracking spreadsheets for materials, sample templates to help guide your narratives and LEED Online submissions, and examples of actual submissions from certified LEED projects for you to check your work against. To get your plaque, start with the right toolkit.
Already a premium member? Log in now
Frequently asked questions
For the twenty products with EPDs, can I count multiple products from the same manufacturer?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
If I include a product with an EPD in Option 1, do I have to also include it in the scope of products that are part of the Option 2 calculation?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
If I include a product in the BPDO EPDs credit, do I also have to include it in the BPDO Material Ingredients credit?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
Do I have to submit the full EPD with my documentation for Option 1?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
Where can I find a list of products with EPDs?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
How do you recognize each type of EPD?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
If a company provides an EPD but it does not mention on it that it meets the ISO standards required, can we still submit it for LEED or do we need to have that verification?The answer to this question is available to LEEDuser premium members. Start a free trial » (If you're already a premium member, log in here.) |
Addenda
Replace second bullet with the following:
"Environmental product declarations which conform to ISO 14025 and EN 15804 or ISO 21930 and have at least a cradle to gate scope."
Updated calculator to display all Material content on other tabs
Removed 30% cap language
At the end of the “Requirements” section in each of the BPDO credits, change text to the following:
“Structure and enclosure materials may not constitute more than 30% of the value of compliant building products. Projects with significant amounts of structural and enclosure materials may exceed the 30% limit by calculating an alternative structure and enclosure limit (See Equation 3 under Further Explanation).”
Furthermore, add the following new section in every BPDO credit under “Further Explanation - CALCULATIONS”:
“Equation 3: Alternative Structure & Enclosure Percentage Limit for Option 2
For projects with significant amounts of structure and enclosure materials, the following calculation can be made to determine an alternative limit for the percentage of value that structure and enclosure materials can contribute to credit achievement. Note: this option is only available for projects that use the actual materials cost method (not the default cost method) to determine total project material costs.
Equation 3: Alternative Structure and Enclosure limit
Alternative Structure and Enclosure limit = (value $ of total building materials that are structural or enclosure) [divided by] (total actual materials value $)
Use the results of equation 3 to replace the 30% contribution factor limit in determining compliance with the credit.”
Revisions to the 30% cap on structure and enclosure materials.
Under 5th bullet, for the impact category formation of tropospheric ozone add unit is measure "kg O3 eq" to reflect TRACI version 2.1 so the sentence reads "formation of tropospheric ozone, in kg NOx, kg O3 eq, or kg ethene; and..."
Under 5th bullet, for the impact category formation of tropospheric ozone add unit is measure "kg O3 eq" to reflect TRACI version 2.1 so the sentence reads "formation of tropospheric ozone, in kg NOx, kg O3 eq, or kg ethene; and..."
In Table 1. Example Calculation for $500 office chair, the row “Wheels” in the column “Percentage of component meeting sustainability criteria” replace "5% with "10%" so the cell reads “10% postconsumer recycled content”
Revised location valuation factor calculations to specify that the entire product meets local criteria.
Definition of "product (permanently installed building product" revise the last sentence to say " In addition, similar products within a specification can each contribute as separate products."
In the 3rd paragraph for BD+C and 2nd paragraph for ID+C replace the 4th-7th sentences with the following: "If optional products or materials are included in cost-based credit calculations, such as Option 2 under each Building Product Disclosure and Optimization credits, they must be included consistently across all cost-based credit calculations. Additionally, if optional products and materials are included in product based calculations, such as Option 1 under each Building Product Disclosure and Optimization credits, they are not required to be included in cost-based credit calculations. However, unlike furniture, if some of these products are included in credit calculations, not all products of that type must be included."
We are a manufacturer working with a program operator in Europe to develop environmental product declarations. We are looking for clarification on applicability of Option 1: Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) that requires approved products to be third party verified (Type III) with external verification in which the manufacturer is explicitly recognized as the participant by the program operator. The EPDs that we have developed for our products with the program operator meet all LEED criteria for Type III product specific EPDs as defined by ISO standards ISO 14025, 14040 and 14044 and are consistent with PCR standard EN 15804 with the exception of being covered by a third party verification that includes external verification. Per ISO 14025 or EN 15804, there is no requirement for the product declarations to be ‘externally verified’. Our EPDs follow an independent review process per Section 8: Verification of ISO 14025 standard and includes verification of conformance to ISO 14025, 14040 and 14044 as well as PCR standards. We are looking for published clarification on eligibility of independently reviewed product-specific EPDs in LEED v4.
Type of Reporting Format
Tier
ISO 14044 compliant product-specific life cycle assessments
1
ISO 14025 and EN 15804/ISO 21930 compliant generic EPDs
2
ISO 14025 and EN 15804/ISO 21930 compliant internally verified product-specific EPDs
3
ISO 14025 and EN 15804/ISO 21930 compliant 3rd party verified product-specific EPDs
4
Can equipment and machinery in CSI divisions 11, 21-28 and other specialty divisions, including special equipment such as elevators, escalators, process equipment, and fire suppression systems contribute towards the 20 minimum number of products required in Option 1 of Building Product Disclosure and Optimization – Environmental Product Declarations, Building Product Disclosure and Optimization – Sourcing of Raw Materials, and of Building Product Disclosure and Optimization – Material Ingredients?
Yes, these products may contribute towards Option 1 of Building Product Disclosure and Optimization – Environmental Product Declarations, Building Product Disclosure and Optimization – Sourcing of Raw Materials, and of Building Product Disclosure and Optimization – Material Ingredients. Note that if these products are included in Option 1 of a credit, they are not required to be included in Option 2.
How many times can a single industry-wide (generic) EPD contribute to Option 1, Environmental Product Declarations?
A single industry-wide (generic) EPD can be used for up to 10 products listed within the industry-wide EPD, provided that each application has separately reported impacts within the EPD.
How can products contribute to earning Option 2 of the LEED v4 MR credit BPDO – Environmental Product Declarations?
In addition to the option outlined in the credit language, products that meet any of the following requirements can also contribute towards Option 2:
1. Demonstrate reduced impact with a product-specific EPD against an industry-wide generic EPD, provided the manufacturer was part of the study and the two conform to the same PCR.
2. Demonstrate reduced impact of the same product, over time, with two product-specific EPDs.