The intent of a proposed innovation credit cannot be identical to or repetitive of the intent of an existing LEED credit within the EBOM rating system. For example, installing a cutting-edge, ultra-high-efficiency chiller is not an appropriate candidate f

The intent of a proposed innovation credit cannot be identical to or repetitive of the intent of an existing LEED credit within the EBOM rating system. For example, installing a cutting-edge, ultra-high-efficiency chiller is not an appropriate candidate for an IO credit, because the energy savings resulting from its employment are already captured by EAc1.

In LEED 2009, a credit interpretation ruling (CIR) is project-specific, therefore is neither precedent-setting nor published for other projects to view. The published database of pre-LEED 2009 CIRs may not be referenced or relied upon by project teams pur

In LEED 2009, a credit interpretation ruling (CIR) is project-specific, therefore is neither precedent-setting nor published for other projects to view. The published database of pre-LEED 2009 CIRs may not be referenced or relied upon by project teams pursuing certification under LEED 2009. However, the CIRs may offer useful ideas for identifying appropriate innovation credits. More information is available on the GBCI website. 

Project teams seeking pre-approval for an IO strategy may submit a credit interpretation ruling (CIR) explaining the proposed approach in as much detail as possible. CIRs are formal communications with the GBCI regarding the application of credit requirem

Project teams seeking pre-approval for an IO strategy may submit a credit interpretation ruling (CIR) explaining the proposed approach in as much detail as possible. CIRs are formal communications with the GBCI regarding the application of credit requirements to the specific conditions of the project. CIRs may be submitted to GBCI for $220 per topic.