Nowadays, many local energy codes are exceeding LEED's ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Baseline. Has anybody successfully claimed energy savings for unfinished tenant spaces based on local code?
- Provide a copy of the local code requirements that are more stringent than ASHRAE 90.1-2016. Indicate in writing (highlight or provide section references) how the code will require a project like the one being proposed to follow the code.
- Provide a binding owner commitment letter paired with sample lease, ensuring that the specific local code requirements modeled will be installed in the building. The sample lease agreement must include language that is specific enough to address the credit claimed (e.g. The project must meet the Seattle Energy Code 2015 Lighting Power requirements using the Building Area Method; OR the project must have 15 SEER air conditioners for systems less than 6 tons, and 11.5 EER air conditioners for systems larger than 5 tons.)
- Note that credit may not be claimed for measures that would only be implemented in certain tenant configurations, where the binding tenant requirements do not ensure incorporation into the project. For example, credit may not be claimed for daylighting controls that are only required in open-space configurations, without specifying the area that must be fitted out with daylight controls. Similarly, credit may not be claimed for simply stating that the project must meet the local code lighting power requirements, when there are multiple methods for demonstrating lighting compliance.