Forum discussion

Stanford research request

All,

I recently met Sahil Tadwalkar who is a Stanford MS Candidate in Civil Engineering. He and his group are interviewing design and construction industry professionals to understand issues and challenges around specifying and using low carbon solutions on projects. Interesting stuff! I encourage you to contribute by setting up an interview with Sahil if you are interested:

We are a team of five Stanford graduate students researching the decarbonization of new commercial and large residential buildings. Our team was accepted into a Stanford Lean Launchpad course, led by Professor Steve Blank, where we will be interviewing >100 stakeholders in our problem space over 10 weeks. 

Our hypothesis is that part of the reason no/low-carbon building solutions are not incorporated in new building construction is due to misaligned incentives. Our goal is to identify the friction points hindering mass adoption of no/low carbon building materials and energy efficiency solutions. We aim to design a solution that will realign incentives in the building process from permitting and design to financing to construction. 

One solution that we are testing to align incentives is third-party financing of low-carbon building materials and high-efficiency equipment in new construction, thus reducing the upfront cost to developers. The third party could then enter a service agreement with the building owner or occupant to split the operating cost savings and environmental benefits generated by these solutions over the operating life of the building. We will be testing this solution and others with our stakeholders over the next few months, and we would be grateful for any time you can spare to share your expertise with us.

If you have 20 minutes or so to discuss your insights into the decarbonization of buildings, please reach out to stadwalk@stanford.edu

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 01/11/2022 - 21:07

Did you tell them the punchline is that their idea won't work without a price on carbon? Back to the drawing board! Stanford is slippin! Steven Burke. LEED & WELL Faculty Director Of Sustainability m: 774.462.2044 consigli.com

Tue, 01/11/2022 - 22:16

After posting this, a friend has checked in on my mental wellbeing (which is, rest assured, seemingly close to sane) and suggested I provide some brief, thoughtful elaboration on my thinking. As described, the premise is to consider using third-party financing to offset the upfront cost of environmentally preferable, low-carbon solutions on building projects. However, without a cost on carbon, there are no savings to use for paying back the initial capital on low-carbon material solutions. If the savings are coming from energy, there are plenty of existing services for that to be utilized. Good in concept - and they correctly identify misaligned incentives of profit for the individual over the environmental benefits for all as the bottleneck (tragedy of the commons and such) - but without pricing carbon their current idea seems like a nonstarter for the materials piece. (Also, I may have misinterpreted high efficiency equipment to mean construction equipment). But, don't let me stand in the way of bright minds who want to apply themselves to these critical issues! I'm hoping for the "easy button" app that uses AI to solve all these things for us! (And I have nothing but respect for Stanford - the Harvard of the West!). Apologies for my initially terse review Steven Burke. LEED & WELL Faculty Director Of Sustainability m: 774.462.2044 consigli.com

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.