Forum discussion

Pilot-Credits SSpc113:Informing Design Using Triple Bottom Line Analysis

Using Autocase to document SSpc113

We used Autocase to document this pilot credit. It was a good process, though we needed lots of help from our account rep, who was thankfully willing to walk us through the process.  We found some limitations in the software for our project type, but Autocase was able to take our feedback and limitations back to their software developers. 

Our team found the output from the process very insightful, but knowing it was compared to the LEED baselines vs state and local codes made the data less relevant than it could have been.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 05/25/2022 - 18:56

We also had some trouble translating the inputs they asked for which are different than how LEED outputs. Would be great if those software inputs better matched some of the LEED outputs (ie should input in Autocase water baseline & water design case and it automatically calculates the savings since LEED doesn't include that in its summary)

Thu, 09/04/2025 - 18:15

Our team recently worked on an international project in Thailand and with the help of the Autocase rep, we were able to pursue pilot credits SSpc113 and SSpc122. They adjusted the Autocase inputs to be region specific. Previously, we had thought only domestic projects could be analyzed using the software.  

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.