See all forum discussions about NC-v4 EAp2
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-v4 EAp2 Post a new question aboutNC-v4 EAp2
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4 EAp2»
FAQs about EAp2 :

Do the required savings for this prerequisite (and credit) need to come only from building energy, or also process loads?

Our project doesn't have enough energy savings to earn the prerequisite. Can we get there by incorporating onsite renewables?

Our proposed design has insulation R-values that are below those prescribed by ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Can we still meet the prerequisite?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performance

Simulation Model upload

Default Avatar
R.L. Bowen
RLBA
LEEDuser Premium Member
1 thumbs up

Hi! We recently uploaded a project for review. Unfortunately we missed uploading the actual energy model. Since there has been a lot of personel changes in the current Covid situation, we are unable to track the original model on which the summary was based as well as the engineer who created it. In this situation, does USGBC allow for an updated model that meets the credit threshold but is not exactly the same as the original one? 

Thanks in advance.

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user sheffer
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow
7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
4454 thumbs up

Tue, 10/27/2020 - 19:39

So you submitted for a preliminary review using an older model, received comments, can't find the older model and now need to resubmit for the final review? Is that correct? I have seen projects who submit a whole new model for the final review, even using different software. So yes you can submit a new one. The odds of having to submit an appeal get significantly higher in these kinds of situation.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.