Forum discussion

NC-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performance

Problem with the Quality Assurance Check Section of the MEPC

Hi everyone,

We're having problem with the Quality Assurance Check section of the MEPC v05. We write our responses to the identified issues after completing the MEPC, but when we open the calculator in a different Excel version, extra issues are highlighted which are not valid. Has anyone encountered such a problem?

In this situation, we can never be sure if the reviewers will also see our completed MEPC as we see it.

 

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 12/19/2018 - 14:45

Those have often not worked correctly. Reviewers are aware of this. If you are concerned that the reviewer will not see your response to the legitimate issues raised in this part of the MEPC then I would simply provide a separate narrative document addressing the issues in question. It is always helpful to provide an explanation for issues in the modeling results to head off review comments before you receive them.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.