FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CS-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Thermal zones split and AHU serving them

Greetings,

The project we are modeling is an office building Core and Shell type with a Г shape. It consists of large office zones, as they will be later subdivided to the future tenants.

As the thermal zone requires, we are splitting these large zones, so that they to correspond to the thermal zone requirement. There are 5 office floor levels. They are served by three AHU. The AHUs however is serving every floor in a different way, meaning that they covers zones which do not coincide to the thermal zone split, which leads to additional splitting of the thermal zones, resulting in more and more rooms.

The questions is:

Could we combine the three AHUs, meaning sum-up their airflow quantities, fan powers, heat recovery parameters and to model these office floors as they are served by one large AHU. This practically will allow us to remain only by the floor splitting, which will be in accordance to the thermal zone rules.

You opinion is highly appreciated.

Thanks.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 08/17/2018 - 14:04

In general it is usually best to model the project as designed. Deviations from that require you to provide a thorough explanation and justification to the reviewer. It often opens up the review to many questions. You will need to follow the rules governing thermal blocks in Table G3.1-7 and 8. If you can demonstrate that you meet the exception you can deviate from the design in the model. You will need to make the case to the reviewer that what you are doing is thermodynamically similar or is a conservative approach.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.