Forum discussion

NC-2009 MPR3:Must use a reasonable site boundary

City right of ways

Hello there,

There is a right of way bordering and in our project site. Does this have to be included in the LEED project site boundary? It was agreed that our project will not be completing the work on that area.

The reference guide states "Land which is covered by a city easement 'may' be included in the LEED project site boundary." 

 

Thank you!

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Sat, 10/28/2017 - 01:39

Ashley, An example of a city easement that might be included in the LEED boundary could be underground utilities or overhead wires that cross your site. The city reserves the right to access this easement and prohibits you from building on it, but the area may still be part of your landscaping or open space and thus would make sense to include in your LEED boundary. Projects sometimes include areas within the public right of way such as sidewalks, grass parking strips, etc. If those are being built as part of the project, you are expected to include them. Sometimes an existing sidewalk or ROW may included when this area contributes to credits such as open space, habitat, or heat island non-roof credits (street trees, pedestrian-oriented hardscape, pervious landscaping). The challenge is that any area that's included in the LEED boundary has to be addressed by all credits. Sometimes including parts of the ROW may help earn some credits but not others. The area might help with open space, but you'll have to include it in your stormwater management and light pollution boundary, and the project may not have control over the performance of those city systems. It may help to evaluate each scenario of the LEED boundary designation and the impact each has on credit compliance.

Tue, 10/31/2017 - 17:29

Hello David, thank you very much for your response! I realized that the right of way is actually not in our project site as it is not owned by the same party. It is however adjacent to the site, therefore contiguous and potentially associated with the site. This specific right of way is planned to be a public road. MPR 3 states that “[t]he LEED project boundary may not include land that is owned by a party other than that which owns the LEED project unless that land is associated with and supports normal building operations for the LEED project building.” I hope my understanding is right, but since this land will be used for a public road it would not be supporting the normal building operations, and therefore can be excluded. Thank you, Ashley Hu

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.