Forum discussion

NC-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performance

Tri-gen

Hi, I am QA'ing a model for a building that will be fed via a cogeneration plant (with absorption chillers) and therefore is a little complicated. The cogen plant is owned by the utility (which is technically owned by the municipality which owns the building being built). The building will purchase the electricity from the utility at a reduced rate and get the waste heat for free. It has been modeled as: - The proposed purchases the electricity generated by cogen at the reduced rate with the remainder being purchased at standard rate (15% more) - The baseline is modeled with standard systems and uses the grid supplied gas rate and standard rate for all electricity - The proposed pays for gas at the grid supplied rate for the purpose of the model Does this approach sound valid? Key Q's I think are: 1) is it ok to use different fuel costs for the electricity generated vs. consumed (and therefore proposed and baseline blended rates will be different) if this is as per the contract 2) Should the proposed pay for gas (even if free in reality) and if so should it be a direct purchase amount for the load or should it take account of the CHP efficiency (E.g. 40% thermal) Thanks Victoria

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Mon, 10/31/2016 - 19:30

1. You will need to follow one of the paths in Appendix D of the DESv2. Then follow the rate guidance in section 2.4.2.2. 2. Yes you pay for the gas accounting for the CHP efficiency. You will use the same rates for both models but the difference plays out in the allocation of energy use associated with the central plant. In particular the proportional CHP production of electricity gets entered in the form as a negative value.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.