I am trying to understand whether the modelling for Option 2 of this credit is supposed to be done using the ECB method or Appendix G. In the initial option wording it says ECB, but under the paths it says 90.1 not specifying a section. One project I am considering currently this would make a big difference to, since ECB would have my water source HP system in the baseline as well, where AppG would have a VAV system as the baseline. I have previously been told, though I can't now find the reference, that ECB isn't supposed to be used to show percent improvement, only for compliance purposes, so AppG was my instinct. Step 6 of the method talks about Section 11 or Appendix G, do I get to choose? If anyone has done this before I'd appreciate comments, in previous CI projects I have only seen Option 1 being used.
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5909 thumbs up
September 23, 2016 - 11:01 am
You get to choose.
The full procedure for doing this modeling is contained in the Reference Guide.