FAQs about EAp2 :

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

CHP District Energy System

We are working on the certification of a building that will be connected to a DES using a CHP plant. The DES delivers to the building chilled and hot water for cooling, heating and DHW. The DES has a cogeneration biomass plant (residue from city parks). The electricity produced is directly used into the DES. Actually the cogeneration system produces 3 times the whole electricity consumed by the plant, including chillers and circulation pumps consumption. The thermal output of the cogeneration biomass plant is used within the DES to enhance the efficiency of the gas boilers that deliver hot water to the buildings. The question is: do we have to follow the Appendix D of the 'Treatment of District or Campus Thermal Energy in LEED' guide? From this guide and also from what is said in the reference guide EAc1 CASES 3 and 4. District CHP it seems that the electricity allocation for the building is related with the thermal output of the CHP. I think this would be restrictive in our case as the electricity output of the CHP covers all electricity needs of the DES plant. We would appreciate any thought on this situation!

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 01/26/2016 - 15:55

Where is the project located?

Tue, 01/26/2016 - 16:02

The project is in Spain, Barcelona

Tue, 01/26/2016 - 22:15

You are not required to follow that guidance as you can always use DESv2 Option 1 or 90.1-2007 Addendum ai. You will need to use some type of guidance to model your situation. Another option is this for European projects. http://www.usgbc.org/resources/treatment-scandinavian-district-energy-systems-leed-v1-2012-0

Fri, 01/29/2016 - 15:05

Marcus, thanks for your guidance. Instead of DESv2 Option 1, we are looking into DESv2 Option 2 in order to account for DES actual efficiencies. The DES we will be connected to includes a cogeneration plant producing heat, cold and electricity. The input energy of the DES is biomass and gas. The DES provides hot and cold water to its network of customers. The net electricity they produce is not sold to their customers but to a utility company. The cogeneration plant consumes 28 units of biomass to produce 12 units of electricity and 9 units of heat. 4 units of electricity are consumed by the DES itself (for chillers to produce cold water and distribution pumps). The 8 remaining units of electricity are sold to the utility company. The heat is complemented with additional heat generated by a gas boiler using 4 units of gas and distributed as hot water to the clients. The DES distributes 12 units of hot water and 8 units of cold water to their clients. We would like to use Option 2 of the DES guidelines. For this situation, the baseline would be modelled as per Appendix G with electricity for cooling and gas for heating. According to the Option 2, DES guidelines, the proposed case will have the chillers and boiler of the DES plant and the cost of the produced energy is calculated as follows: cost of biomass divided by the total thermal outputs of the plant (cost of 28 units of biomass + 4 units of gas / (12+8 units of thermal outputs = $/kWh). If this is correct we are including energy inputs associated with the electricity sold to a third party (the utility). How do we take this into account?

Fri, 01/29/2016 - 15:14

Marcus, thank you for your guidance. In order to account for actual DES efficiencies, we are looking at DESv2 Option 2. The DES we will be connected to includes a cogeneration plant producing heat, cold and electricity. The input energy of the DES is biomass and gas. The DES provides hot and cold water to its network of customers. The net electricity they produce is not sold to their customers but to a utility company. The cogeneration plant consumes 28 units of biomass to produce 12 units of electricity and 9 units of heat. 4 units of electricity are consumed by the DES itself (for chillers to produce cold water and distribution pumps). The heat is complemented with additional heat generated by a gas boiler using 4 units of gas and distributed as hot water to the clients. So, with 28 units of biomass and 4 units of gas, the DES distributes 12 units of hot water and 8 units of cold water to their clients while selling 8 units of electricity to the utility company. According to Option 2 of the DES guidelines, the baseline would be modelled as per Appendix G with electricity for cooling and gas for heating. For the proposed case, we simulate the chillers and boiler of the DES plant and the cost of the produced energy is calculated as follows: cost of biomass divided by the total thermal outputs of the plant (cost of 28 units of biomass + 4 units of gas / (12+8 units of thermal outputs = $/kWh). If this is correct we are including energy inputs associated with the electricity sold to a third party (the utility). How do we take this into account?

Fri, 01/29/2016 - 21:25

(cost of 28 units of biomass + 4 units of gas) / (12 units of hot water) = $/kWh of fuel used to produce the hot water in the Proposed model The 8 units of cold water are modeled as all electricity in the Proposed Case. The electricity produced by the cogen plant gets allocated to the building according to Appendix D of the DESv2. It does not matter how much electricity is used in the plant or sold to the utility.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.