Recently, there was a discussion in this forum on exterior lighting being a mandatory requirement for EAP2 compliance. In continuation with that discussion, i request for a couple of clarifications: 1) In a scenario where total exterior LPD exceeds baseline case. However, the exterior lighting is partly through solar and the portion of the lighting which is not solar powered will have LPD less than baseline. In such a scenario baseline electric cost of exterior lighting will be greater than proposed electric cost. Is this approach acceptable? 2) Section 6.4, mandates HVAC equipment efficiency. Is it acceptable to go for a COP lower than the baseline case and IPLV greater than the baseline case under ARI conditions? Kindly clarify.
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.