FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Process or non-process? Kitchen Hood Exhaust and Makeup Air

I thought I recalled reading that the HVAC energy related to a commercial kitchen hood was considered Process Energy. Then I read on page 238 of LEED Reference Guide For Green Building Design and Construction 2009 Edition that "kitchen hood exhaust" IS considered regulated non-process energy. Is the makeup air unit considered process and the exhaust fan considered process? I thought the entire hood system was related to cooking, thus a process load. Am I correct? Can someone please clarify for me what portions of a commercial kitchen are considered regulated (non-process) energy and what portions are considered non-regulated (process) energy? Thanks!

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 02/04/2015 - 22:18

I think I answered this a bit ago in one of these forums. As I recall when the hood is make up air and exhaust without any space conditioning then it is process. When the hood includes some space conditioning that serves the space surrounding the hood then it is not process.

Thu, 02/05/2015 - 13:55

So even if the makeup air is heated, it's still considered Process Energy as long as that same air isn't being used to condition the space, correct? I have a kitchen with a gas fired makeup air unit ducted directly to the exhaust hood, and also a separate heating/cooling split system ducted to the space.

Thu, 02/05/2015 - 14:06

Correct. Prescriptively in 90.1 (section 6.5.7.1) the make up air should only be tempered, not fully heated.

Thu, 02/05/2015 - 14:18

Thank you.

Mon, 11/11/2019 - 23:47

Hello, Is this still the case with LEEDv4?

Tue, 11/12/2019 - 13:50

Have you noticed any change in 90.1-2010 that would lead you to think otherwise?

Thu, 05/29/2025 - 22:33

Hi, in my case (LEED ID+C:Retail v4) the kitchen hood is integrated with the HVAC system, namely it exhausts part of the outdoor air introduced by the AHU which is in charge of the air conditioning and ventilation of the spaces (restaurant, kitchen and storage rooms). Indeed, the project documents consider explicitly that the AHU's return air flow rate is lower than the supply.  Is it correct to consider the kitchen hood as regulated non-process energy, since the makeup air is also used for space conditioning?  How should be modelled the baseline HVAC system?: A) explicitly model the kitchen hood in addition to the baseline HVAC system (as electric load or as exhaust fan), with same air flow rate and fan characteristics as the proposed case, and add its fan consumption to the fan power allowed for the HVAC system according to section 6.5.3.1.1 ASHRAE 90.1-2010; B) same as A, but considering the minimum air flow rate extraction requirement according to ventilation prerequisite EQp1, instead of the design extraction flow rate; C) consider the kitchen hood as belonging to the ventilation system and therefore delete it from the baseline HVAC system, in this case its power would be considered part of the allowed fan power for the HVAC system according to section 6.5.3.1.1 ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Considering that for the kitchen room the exception G.3.1.1b applies (but not the G3.1.1d) and therefore a dedicated HVAC System type 4 is present, is it correct to size the outdoor air flow rate on the kitchen hood extraction rate, being this the most demanding requisite?  How to model a similar case, but where the kitchen hood extracts the totality of the supply air delivered by the AHU for ventilation and space conditioning (100% outdoor air, supply fan only) ? Thank you

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.