We are doing a project where the addition to a high school on a large campus included no new parking spaces. We are pursuing Case 1, Option 2, No parking or subsidized parking. What we mean of course is no "NEW" parking or subsidized parking. Does that meet the intent of this credit or not? Based on the clarification comments, it appears we aren't meeting the intent of this credit. If we change to Case 1, Option 1 and provide vanpool spaces, would the count be based on staff FTE or on staff and student FTE? Our assumption is that we could argue that staff only, since the student population is not affected by the specialty nature of the addition (art and library spaces expanded). Thanks for any thoughts on these two questions.
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.