Forum discussion

NC-2009 SSc6.1:Stormwater Design—Quantity Control

stormwater when site is directly on the river?

site is on the river. I assume this doesn't change anything, but civil engineer asked I check to see if LEED has exceptions for this. I guess the thought was that it might be strange to retain stormwater on site so it can be slowly released - essentially right back on site (property line is technically in the river) thoughts?

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 09/19/2014 - 13:36

There are several discussions on direct discharge districts below. But essentially, there is no exception for this credit. You either meet the rate/volume reductions or you do not.

Fri, 09/19/2014 - 13:48

thanks Michael. I did read below but I guess I must have not understood. Suppose we pursued the stream/channel protection option? All water from the site that isn't absorbed into ground will be cleaned by Snoit filters, then directed to a outlet pipe in the bulkhead, where it will dump into river (which Houston is fine with stormwater into river). Since the only "stream"/waters edge is the actual river - would a steel bulkhead be considered erosion control? I mean, there certainly will not be any erosion. again, sorry if these are answered below just not real clear to me thanks very much...

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.