FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CS-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

DES Option 2

We are dealing with the project served by DES. As client’s goal is to achieve Platinum we are proceeding with option 2 of modelling DES. Our DES is served with mix fuel ( coal, biomass and oil) for which we calculated fuel mix price as 26,47 $/MWh. Our baseline system is on-site gas boiler for which fuel utility rate is 50,8$/MWh . As DES guidance is super unclear we have a question in regard to the rates used for calculations: should we use the same rates for baseline and proposed building equal to = 26,47 $/MWh (as calculated for the fuel mix)? Or maybe ,the same utility rates for base and proposed which are required in DES guide means that they must be consistent in both base and proposed building i.e. if DES will use gas it will be priced at rate of 50,8$/MWh - the same as baseline? Any comments will be appreciated

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Mon, 06/02/2014 - 14:41

Use the same rate in both models based on the rate calculated for the DES.

Mon, 06/02/2014 - 18:00

But that don't make any sense, to price gas as fuel mix. Plus it's not giving any benefit of DES over standard boiler. I found the guide which a bit clarifies the DES LEED guidance. Based on it I think we could use different energy rates for the base and proposed. Marcus could you look at it and comment that? http://www.districtenergy.org/assets/pdfs/LEED/DES-User-Guide.pdf

Mon, 06/02/2014 - 18:23

The gas price has nothing to do with it in this case since the DES does not use gas. Appendix G does not say that the Baseline is always gas. The Baseline uses the same fuel as the Proposed in Appendix G. See G2.4 - the energy cost is determined using the actual rate. The rates applied to each model must be identical. Section 2.4.2.2 of the DES v2 states that the rates must follow the normal Appendix G and LEED protocol. The DES guidance is set up to account for the impact of the DES. If the system is more efficient than the Baseline you show savings, if not you show a penalty. In general Appendix G and LEED do not allow savings related to the comparison of different fuels. The document is certainly not an official document so it does not really matter what it says but it is technically correct. If the DES used gas you use the building rate for the gas (not the DES gas rate) in both models. Since this does not apply to your case and 2.4.2.2 Exception a does apply, you use the central plant rate.

Mon, 06/02/2014 - 18:29

In the future please post your questions and comments in only one of the energy-related forums. I monitor them all and would prefer not to have to reply twice. There is also a DES specific forum - http://www.leeduser.com/topic/new-district-energy-guidance-leed-released-usgbc

Tue, 06/03/2014 - 14:44

Marcus sorry if I double post it. Still have doubts with the DES and rates which should be applied. I’ve looked at documents which you mentioned and: G2.4 indeed defines that the energy cost are determined using the actual rates, but it not specified what rates should be applied to based and proposed. As you mentioned Section 2.4.2.2 of the DES v2 states that the rates must follow the normal Appendix G and LEED protocol. I ‘ve looked at LEED Guidance and page 268 describes rates which should be applied for district CHP (our case) and describes them as follows: The baseline heating and cooling plant uses the backup energy source of the design building (our case diesel fuel only for emergency electricity generation, no heating/cooling backup), or electricity if no backup source is present. In case of the CHP we charge the fuel input, considering process energy related to DES operation. That’s what ASHRAE and LEED states, unless I’ve missed something. Is that right ?

Tue, 06/03/2014 - 14:36

CHP make it all a bit more complicated but the fundamental rules do not change. You need to use the same rates in the baseline and proposed. Since you are not using gas you apply the central plant rates. You cannot use a different rate between the two models.

Tue, 06/03/2014 - 14:46

But what about LEED guidance and info stated on the page 268 in regards to CHP ? "The baseline heating and cooling plant uses the backup energy source of the design building (our case diesel fuel only for emergency electricity generation, no heating/cooling backup), or electricity if no backup source is present." How to understand that in relation to what you wrote ?

Tue, 06/03/2014 - 15:01

It seems to me that you are taking one sentence and trying to justify a comparison that uses different rates. You need to look at all of the applicable documents, not just the one that appears to give you the answer you want. I simply do not have the time it would take to figure this out for you. It is entirely possible that there are contradictory statements within the official LEED documents.

Tue, 06/03/2014 - 15:14

Yep that's the problem of DES, and it's LEED guidance. Simply not clear. Sounds like the safest way will be use the same rates or do CIR Thanks a lot for your time Marcus.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.