FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

District Thermal Energy and Single LEED project boundary

The project comprises four hospital buildings, called B, C, D and E, and each building is registered as an individual project on a campus basis. A chilled water plant, located at the roof of building C, serves buildings B and C. According to the document “Treatment of District or Campus Thermal Energy in LEED® V2 and LEED® 2009 – Design & Construction”, of August 2010, if a central plant does not serve other buildings not within the LEED project boundaries for the project, the plant is not defined as a District or Campus Energy System – DES. This inquiry is to confirm that: 1. Since buildings are not grouped as a single LEED project, the central plant shall be treated as a DES and compliance shall be demonstrated following one of the following options: Option 1 (streamlined): the building stand-alone scenario, with 12 points cap, i.e. the central plant is modeled as purchased energy for both the baseline and proposed case energy models, with no direct accounting of the district network’s efficiency, and a restriction of the maximum number of points that can be earned under EAc1. Option 2 (full accounting): the aggregate building / DES scenario with 8 points floor, i.e. the efficiency of the central plant is directly accounted in the proposed case energy model, baseline case is modeled according to standard ASHRAE 90.1 baseline system, and the project must achieve a certain minimum number of points under EAc1. 2. In order to the central plant not to be treated as a DES, buildings B and C should be registered under a single group project.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Thu, 04/03/2014 - 15:16

Your interpretation for both item #1 and #2 above sound correct to me.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.