Forum discussion

CI-2009 EAc3:Measurement and Verification

Spot Metering for CI 2009 EAc3 Option B

I am working on a project which is considering pursuing CI 2009 EAc3 Option B. I am wondering if continuous metering is required for this path or if spot metering would be acceptable. I know that continuous metering has been removed in the redline version of CI but I was of the opinion that spot metering would be more applicable to the calibrated simulation option (Option D). Another point, on this project major changes are being made to the building's central plant (basically everything to do with the central cooling plant is being replaced), lighting and space layouts. Essentially everything is changing completely excep the building envelope. Is option B even applicable in this case? The design team is pushing for option B because they want to reduce costs and avoid doing a full calibrated model but it is my opinion that given the number of changes the "retrofit isolation" option isn't applicable.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Mon, 04/07/2014 - 13:15

No metering of any kind is required under Option B or D of the IPMVP. Both submeters and spot measurements could be used under either option. Sounds to me like Option B does not apply since you will be implementing energy saving strategies that have interactive effects. Under CI you are required to show some lighting savings so this end use alone can't be isolated as it impacts heat, cooling, fans, etc.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.