See all forum discussions about NC-2009 MRc5
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 MRc5 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 MRc5
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 MRc5»
FAQs about MRc5 :

Why can’t I include mechanical, electrical and plumbing components in this credit? What if I consistently include MEP materials in the calculations for all of the MR credits I’m attempting?

We are pursuing IEQc4.5 as an ID credit. Are we thus required to include the cost of furniture in MRc3–7?

What if different parts of a product are manufactured at different locations?

What is the purpose of the newly added Option 2? Can I pursue both options?

How do we account for materials using the new Option 2 equation?

With steel and aluminum products, why do I often get review comments questioning why my extraction distance is the same as my manufacture distance?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 MRc5:Regional Materials

Option 2 documentation?

Default Avatar
Erica Downs
LEED Consultant
The Green Engineer
LEEDuser Basic Member
188 thumbs up

Has anyone received any feedback yet on Option 2 documentation? Do we need to collect shipping manifests or anything like that? Also, has there been any clarification on whether the "total distance traveled" is actual miles, or "as the crow flies"? thanks!

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Default Avatar
Erica Downs
LEED Consultant
The Green Engineer
LEEDuser Basic Member
188 thumbs up

Tue, 11/19/2013 - 04:20

Still for looking for advice from anyone with Review experience when using Option 2.... We have suppliers submitting "rail distances" with no supporting documentation whatsoever. How is this supposed to be determined?? Thanks!

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.