See all forum discussions about EBOM-2009 EAc2.3
 Subscribe to new posts about EBOM-2009 EAc2.3 Post a new question aboutEBOM-2009 EAc2.3
See LEEDuser’s guidance on EBOM-2009 EAc2.3»
FAQs about EAc2.3 :

Is it possible to achieve EAc2.3 if our team conducted an ASHRAE Level II Audit to meet EAc2.1?

Are equipment and systems controlled by tenants required to be included in the ongoing commissioning plan?

What types of buildings are likely to benefit from ongoing commissioning?

View answers »

Forum discussion

EBOM-2009 EAc2.3:Existing Building Commissioning—Ongoing Commissioning

Ongoing Cx Requirements

I have a question regarding EA2.3 As I understand it, it appears that the ongoing Cx process effectively begins with EAc2.1 and EAc2.2. The ongoing Cx plan must also include budgets and schedules for repeating this work at a given frequency, etc. My question is: Do we need to confirm and document that the implemented changes in EAc2.2 were implemented correctly in EAc2.2, EAc2.3, or neither? Can we simply state what changes were made as part of the deficiency resolution or do we need to submit proof that it was resolved? Thanks

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Thu, 11/07/2013 - 21:16

Hi Colleen You will definitely need to document that the changes were implemented in EAc2.2 as this is essentially the credit requirements. But for EAc2.3, I think for LEED purposes, you will just need to update any changes to building systems as a result of activities completed in EAc2.1 and EAc2.2 that would result in changes to the OCx plan. In other words, I don't think there is a need to document these changes in EAc2.3, but rather be sure that OCx plans are updated if any changes are made to systems in EAc2.1 / EAc2.2. Let me know if you'd like

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.