Dear community, I am facing a problem meeting the eap2 credit since my project presents almost 80% energy cost related to process. In order to solve this problem, I am trying to claim that my process machines are more energy-efficient than the standard process machines. For the comparison, should I consider the worldwide standard process machine, or can I consider local ones? The point is that I know that our process machines are very standard in the US or EU, but the project client wants to claim that he is "broadening" good practices. Does that make sense to you? thanks all for your clarifications, VG
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.