See all forum discussions about CI-2009 SSc3.3
 Subscribe to new posts about CI-2009 SSc3.3 Post a new question aboutCI-2009 SSc3.3
See LEEDuser’s guidance on CI-2009 SSc3.3»
FAQs about SSc3.3 :

Why are the CI designated parking requirements in Cases 1 and & 2 Option 1 determined by a Full Time Equivalent of tenant space/building while for New Construction the requirements are simply a percentage of parking provided?

If a CI project occupies a building that has existing parking, but no designated parking to the tenant, can it pursue “no parking will be provided"?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CI-2009 SSc3.3:Alternative Transportation—Parking Availability

Exemplary Performance Point

Can anyone decribe what is expected by "demonstrate a quantifiable reduction in personal automobile use"? Is this just a plan that describes what options are available and how the occupants can access them, or do I have to complete an Alternative transporation/Commute Survey to demonstrate compliance like LEED EBOM 2009 SSc4: Alternative Commuting Transportation?

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user davidp
David Posada
Integrated Design & LEED Specialist
SERA Architects
LEEDuser Expert
1361 thumbs up

Mon, 12/17/2012 - 21:46

The plan describing the transit options available does not by itself quantify how many fewer personal cars will be driven - for that we'd need a transit study showing actual reductions, or a traffic engineering study that uses industry-accepted calculations for predicting car usage.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.