1. Our Design Final Review response denied both EAp2 & IEQp1.
EAp2 had 9 comments (including 2 new issues that were not addressed in the first round of review), which generally address modeling errors and request for more information about the systems being used. The energy model is being revised and the requested data will be provided for the appeal review of this prerequisite.
The second prerequisite, IEQp1, came with two comments, which in general advise us to provide airflow simulation calculations for naturally ventilated spaces. After analyzing with both the mechanical engineer and the contractor, we decided that it was best for the project certification to include exhaust fans for satisfying the prerequisite requirements, which means adjusting the original design.
Still, do we have to appeal (pay) the review for both credits, as we are not challenging the review team’s final response, but incorporating their suggestions into the energy model analysis and the IAQ design?
2. The project is about to be substantially completed and we’ll soon start uploading data for the Construction Review. Does anyone recommend entering Appeal Design Review before or after Construction Review? Can we work on Construction Review credits simultaneously with the Design Appeal being under review?
Thank you for your help
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5909 thumbs up
December 10, 2012 - 3:34 pm
You are making changes and modifying the documentation so you will need to pay for the appeals.
If the design appeals affect any of the construction preliminary credits then I would wait. For example EAp2 should be determined before submitting EAc6 as the results from EAp2 affect the quantity of the green power purchase.