See all forum discussions about NC-2009 IEQc5
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 IEQc5 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 IEQc5
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 IEQc5»
FAQs about IEQc5 :

Should track-off mats being used on the project to meet IEQc5 requirements be included in IEQc4.3 credit requirements?

What is the definition of a high-volume copier?

Do I need to provide dedicated exhaust for my printer or copier?

I do not have 10' of space inside my building entrance to install a walk-off system. Can I include one on the exterior? Can the shape be irregular?

What does ‘regularly used exterior entrance’ mean and how do I know which of my building entrances falls under this category?

Are entryway mats required for a building entrance from another building?

Can I use carpet tile as a track-off system? What about carpet?

Our building has a green cleaning program and is earning an ID credit for it, based on the LEED-EBOM IEQc3 requirements. Can we skip the exhaust requirements for our janitor rooms?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 IEQc5:Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control

Janitor room

Profile picture for user saithamoudi
Saliha AIT
LEED AP BD+C
OGER INTERNATIONAL
LEEDuser Basic Member
4 thumbs up

Hi, I have two options on my project (currently in design stage). The first one is that the janitor room would be a closet inside WCs and so the access to the janitor would be via the WCs. The second is to put the cleaning products in a cupboard in the WCs too. Does the exhaust air system of the toilet be enough to comply for this credit regarding to the chemical product? Please advice.

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Thu, 11/29/2012 - 13:24

The intent of the credit is to protect building occupants from exposure to chemicals through isolation. In my opinion, the strategy of storing them in a cupboard in the WC and then isolating the WC does not meet that intent because users of the WC would still be exposed to the chemicals. The safe thing to do is to keep the chemicals in a closet and meet the separation, negative pressure and self-closing door requirements for the closet.
Profile picture for user saithamoudi
Saliha AIT
LEED AP BD+C
OGER INTERNATIONAL
LEEDuser Basic Member
4 thumbs up

Thu, 11/29/2012 - 13:42

Well do you mean that this credit intent to protect occupant of the building by keeping the chemicals in a separated closet but don't considered the cleaning staff as occupant and don't count the fact that they will have access to the products in the closet where there is an exhaust air as well as the design team proposed it to the WCs?

Thu, 11/29/2012 - 13:49

The idea is to protect everyone from the chemicals while they are being stored and mixed. Exposure will, of course, happen for the custodial staff as they are using the chemicals- that is unavoidable.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.