FAQs about EAp2 :

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CS-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Lighting density in Shopping Centre mall areas

According to ASHRAE 90.1, power allowance for lighting in mall areas is 18 W/m2 (table 9.6.1). However, according to section 9.6.2 of ASHRAE 90.1, an additional lighting power of 10,8 W/m2 is allowed "when lighting is specified in addition to the general lighting for the purpose of decorative appearance". Shopping Centre mall areas are equipped, generally, with lots of lights meeting this purpose. Can we assume a power density of 28,8 W/m2 (18 + 10,8) for the mall areas of the baseline building ? Or are limited to 18 W/m2 ?

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Thu, 11/08/2012 - 19:56

If it truly meets the definition of decorative then yes. In my mind it is decorative if you take it away and the lighting which remains meets the illumination requirements of the space. If it does not then it is at least part general lighting and no additional allowance should be used.

Fri, 11/09/2012 - 13:35

Also, the extra decorative allowance is "up to" 10,8 W/m2. If the light meets the definition of decorative as Marcus mentions (and controlled separately) then you can use the extra amount, up to the maximum. Maybe you only used 23,8 W/m2. You can't claim the remaining 5 W/m2 as a "savings". Your baseline and your design model will use the value of 23,8 W/m2 for that space. So, having a lot of decorative lights will show a zero energy savings, and it might allow you to meet a Code minimum. You'll be in trouble if you do this everywhere and try to meet the LEED requirement of 10% below ASHRAE.

Tue, 11/13/2012 - 09:22

Thank you very much for your comments Marcus and Bill. The idea was to simulate the baseline building with 28,8 W/m2 (general lighting: 18 W/m2 + decorative lighting: 10,8 W/m2 = 28,8 W/m2) and to simulate the proposed design with its actual power density (general lighting: 15 W/m2 + decorative lighting: 5 W/m2 = 20 W/m2). As far as I understand for your comments I cannot do this. I can only use 23 W/m2 (general lighting: 18 W/m2 + decorative lighting: 5 W/m2 = 23 W/m2). Is this interpretation correct ? It seems very difficult for a Shopping Centre to comply with EA.p2: lighting represents 50% of the energy usage and real power densities in mall and shops are typically beyond the ASHRAE power allowances. Do you have any experience in certifying this type of buildings ? What are your recomendations ?

Tue, 11/13/2012 - 14:58

That is how we interpret it. You only get the actual in the Proposed up to the maximum allowance for decorative lighting. Use the requirements to drive a more energy efficient lighting design - this is the real purpose behind this LEED requirement. Finding a loophole in 90.1 does not make the project more energy efficient. In my experience the 90.1 lighting allowances are easy to exceed as long as the designers understand what is required they can usually find a way to make it work. Might want to start with a "no incandescent" design criteria. While it was not a shopping center, we ran into the same issue in an office tower in Italy. The original lighting design was 20 W/m2 and once they understood the requirements they reduced it to under 10. It can be done.

Tue, 11/13/2012 - 15:31

Thanks Marcus. I absolutely agree with you in what concerns office lighting (we are now certifying an office building that was designed with 15 W/m2 and is now bellow 7 W/m2 (tasklight strategy) ! However, lighting in shops is a different matter, its all about ambiance... In a Core & Shell project it is very difficult to impose such a restritive value to the tenants. I am still curious to see what's going on LEED Certified Shopping Centres, I really would like to know which power densities are they using.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.