Forum discussion

CS-2009 EAc6:Green Power

Green e certified equivalence

We have an international project which will engage on a green power tariff with its supplier (indefinitely so not worried about the 2 year issue) Q: has anyone had any experience of international energy suppliers demonstrating compliance with the Green E certified principles and being approved for this route? any thoughts or experiences would be appreciated

1

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 08/01/2012 - 13:15

Make sure that some one gets a copy of the Green-e Energy Standard and addresses the major provisions in regarding equivalency with the product being purchased. These include: - qualifying sources - age of renewables - accounting system (vintage, double counting, etc.) - not produced as the result of a mandate (voluntary market) - any other provisions that apply International projects obviously do not have to meet the location criteria in the Standard. Provide a narrative or table describing how the product being purchased meets each of the applicable provisions of the Standard.

Tue, 06/03/2014 - 10:05

Hi Marcus, My client has signed up to a renewable energy tariff, and we are investigating whether there is scope to get the 2 Green Power credits for the LEED certification (CS 2009). But no project I have had before has ever attempted this, so new territory for us all. I started to demonstrate the alternative’s equivalency to the quality standards established for Green-e Energy products as you recommended: • Green-e Energy National Standard v2.3, Sections II, III (excluding G), IV (excluding A), and V • Green-e Energy Code of Conduct and Customer Disclosure Requirements – Sections III-VII So I started making this direct comparison of the Green-e requirements against the procured renewable energy tariff. I thought that a schedule of requirements may be the simplest way for energy supplier to comment, but the result is pretty large and cumbersome; any chance you can take a look and see if you have any good ideas on how to condense / consolidate into the key issues?

Tue, 06/03/2014 - 14:11

The comparative table you emailed to me is a good way to demonstrate equivalency. I think the key provisions are the ones I listed above.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.