Our contractor would like to use a flat pain that gives both a VOC content measurement and a RAVOC content measurement. The VOC measurement is outside the LEED requirement but the RAVOC is not, and a bit of research shows that RAVOC (Reactivity-Adjusted VOC) is actually a more accurate measurement of the product's harmful properties. Apparently some VOCs are more reactive than others. I haven't found as much info as I would like online, most of it seems to come from one company (Dunn-Edwards Paints) which makes me concerned that these claims may not be valid. Can RAVOC content supersede VOC content for credit complicance? Is there any consensus on the validity of RAVOCs?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.