FAQs about EAp2 :

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Naturally Ventilated Garment Factory for 90.1 appendix G

We are looking to certify a garment factory in Dhaka which will not have any conventional HVAC systems. We would like to know if the following approach can be used for attempting LEED Optimize Energy Performance Credits. Our approach is to first calculate the number of hours of thermal comfort as per ASHRAE- 55 . Then calculate energy costs for Baseline case as air conditioned for all hours and compare it with the proposed case as naturally ventilated for number of hours comfortable plus the cost for air conditioning as per ASHARAE 90.1 (baseline case for HVAC). For Eg – Building Runs for 8760 hrs a year and thermal comfort is met by approx 1000hrs. (This will be derived using simulation software). Baseline Case – Run simulation for 8760 hrs for ASHRAE 90.1 with Base case HVAC system Proposed Case – Run Simulation for 7760 hrs for ASHRAE 90.1with Base Case HVAC System PLUS Run simulation for 1000 hrs with passive strategies. So , basically the savings we will achieve will be mostly because of the 1000hrs of non use of air conditioning.

1

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 05/09/2012 - 13:04

I have not looked for it lately but there was an interpretation dealing with this issue. I would check your methodology against the approved methodology for natural ventilation.

Wed, 05/09/2012 - 15:24

Thanks for your reply , can you please elaborate on the approved methodology as well . ( specifc to this case scenario )

Wed, 05/09/2012 - 16:21

As I recall it was similar to your approach relative to a requirement for thermal comfort evaluation. The modeling was not based on a reduction of simulation hours. This violates a specific modeling protocol (must be a full year simulation all together). The other provision of the ruling as I recall was that the software must be able to directly model natural ventilation without a work around as you propose. Energy Plus models it and probably IES-VE. I do not think that eQUEST or any DOE2 software, Trace or HAP can do it. If you feel strongly that you can justify your approach I would suggest that you submit an interpretation. On the face of it I do not think it would be an acceptable approach.

Wed, 05/09/2012 - 17:03

thanks for the reply , but this approach nowhere looks to run a simulation for less than a year , it is an yearly simulation for the proposed case which is broken up into two parts , for the times when it meets thermal comfort it will be passive strategies and when it does not it will use ASHRAE basecase HVAC system. Also can you please elaborate on the reply you had given in one of the previous strings for a similar question of modelling natural ventilation buildings where you had told a methodology saying that take ASHRAE basecase HVAC system in both cases and keep temperature setpoints high so that they dont get cooling on .. how do we justify it as an approach ,has any such project been awarded with energy points ,, thanks

Wed, 05/09/2012 - 17:15

Add to that this approach mentioned above has been taken from a technical paper on Advanced Energy Modelling for LEED by USGBC.

Wed, 05/09/2012 - 18:03

My confusion on the hours, it obviously did not appear that way to me from your post. The "PLUS" sounded like an additional run. Regarding the cooling set points - this is a way to include cooling systems where they have not been designed in a way that does not impact energy use. It is a work around regarding where Appendix G requires you to include cooling even if it is not in the proposed design. Many projects have used this methodology and it is common practice. 90.1 requires identical temperature set points but does not dictate what they are. This is independent of natural ventilation but can be related. I helped write the Advanced Energy Modeling Guide for LEED and that methodology is based on the interpretation I referenced. Again the software must be able to model natural ventilation directly. You cannot use that methodology if the software can't model natural ventilation. Is the building designed to be naturally ventilated (i.e. no fans/mechanical ventilation)?

Sun, 05/13/2012 - 07:39

Thanks for the reply , the building will be designed with extractor fans and shall also have evaporative cooling ( as the sensible loads will be high ) , similar strategies have been used in a few srilankan garment factory buildings , with regards to this can you please tell on an approach that will be acceptable by LEED for energy credits. Thanks

Mon, 05/14/2012 - 15:03

So this sounds like a cooled and mechanically ventilated building and not natural ventilation. Hard to tell you the exact approach with only very limited knowledge of the project. Since the project has cooling and mechanical ventilation it seems like it should be pretty straight forward, model the proposed as designed and the baseline according to appendix g. 90.1-2010 added systems # 9 and 10 which can be used in appropriate circumstances.

Mon, 05/14/2012 - 17:42

thanks

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.