See all forum discussions about EBOM-2009 IEQc2.4
 Subscribe to new posts about EBOM-2009 IEQc2.4 Post a new question aboutEBOM-2009 IEQc2.4
See LEEDuser’s guidance on EBOM-2009 IEQc2.4»
FAQs about IEQc2.4 :

What qualifies as “regularly occupied spaces” for this credit? Does the total amount of regularly occupied space used for this credit have to match other credits?

We have some vacant tenant spaces. How should I account for those when documenting this credit?

Our multi-story, multi-tenant building has many different floor plans and cubical configurations. Do we need to provide section drawings and floor plans for every space in order to document Option 2: Views?

View answers »

Forum discussion

EBOM-2009 IEQc2.4:Daylight and Views

Changes in Daylighting requirements from v2

I am working on a project that was certified under LEED EB v2. This project is now going for recertification under v3 and I am trying to figure out whether or not we will receive IEQc2.4: Daylighting again. We are following Path 2: Prescriptive. The requirements for both versions are very similar; however, the equations to determine the daylight factor/ daylight zone are a little different. Does anyone have expereince with this and/ or know if the new equation makes a significant difference to your result?

4
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 11/15/2011 - 13:53

Our experience has been that the change in calculation methodology hasn't significantly changed the ability for spaces to comply with the credit. There are some differences, so it is, of course, a case by case basis, but generally we have found that spaces that complied before 2009 still comply in 2009.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.