The ASHRAE requirement (Prerequisite for LEED) limits voltage drop in feeders to 2% based on demand. So while the ampacity of the cables is well below the allowable maximum, voltage drop becomes the limiting factor in high-rise buildings. The NEC limits the feeders to 3% voltage drop (5% overall). Can anyone comment on the counter-productive nature of this requirement for cities like New York? The larger feeder sizes in high-rise buildings becomes costly for owners and takes up more space. How is this an energy saving measure?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Amanda, apologies that this is so late but for anyone else searching "feeders," please note recent interpretation #10218 dated 7/1/2012 which states that "the mandatory provision of ASHRAE 90.1-2007/2010 Section 8.4 will be met as long as the total voltage drop does not exceed 5%." The total voltage drop is defined over "from service entrance to the worst-case connection"
Ante where can I find this interpretation? I looked for in the interpretation section of ASHRAE website but I've not found it. Thank you. Giorgia
Giorgia, this a LEED interpretation, which you can find by going to https://www.usgbc.org/leedinterpretations/lilanding.aspx and searching for "10218"
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.