See all forum discussions about CI-2009 SSc3.3
 Subscribe to new posts about CI-2009 SSc3.3 Post a new question aboutCI-2009 SSc3.3
See LEEDuser’s guidance on CI-2009 SSc3.3»
FAQs about SSc3.3 :

Why are the CI designated parking requirements in Cases 1 and & 2 Option 1 determined by a Full Time Equivalent of tenant space/building while for New Construction the requirements are simply a percentage of parking provided?

If a CI project occupies a building that has existing parking, but no designated parking to the tenant, can it pursue “no parking will be provided"?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CI-2009 SSc3.3:Alternative Transportation—Parking Availability

Off Site Parking

Default Avatar
Jeff Mosher
Project Manager/Sustainable Design Consultant
HDR Architecture Associates Inc.
LEEDuser Basic Member
5 thumbs up

Can one acheive this credit via compliance path B. (no parking) if the facility has no on-site parking, but does have an off-site parking lot with a shuttle service? They are in reality providing probably more parking than what zoning even requires, but it's far enough away from the facility that perhaps it could be considered similar in function to a park-and-ride?

5
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user davidp
David Posada
Integrated Design & LEED Specialist
SERA Architects
LEEDuser Expert
1361 thumbs up

Tue, 05/17/2011 - 21:28

It doesn't sound likely to be accepted, since there is actually parking provided. Also, the shuttles appear to be just replacing the final leg of each person's commute to the building, so it doesn't appear to reduce the total number of cars that the users will drive in order to get to the facility.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.