FAQs about EAp2 :

I have a mixed-use building and am wondering if it is possible to pursue the prerequisite through Case 1. How do we proceed?

We have a building that consists of two attached structures and it’s unclear if we have to consider it a single building or if it should be certified as two separate buildings and benchmarked accordingly. How should we proceed?

How long is an Energy Star label valid to use with a streamlined approach for Case 1?

Our building includes heavy process loads that significantly increase the overall energy use in the building. If we submeter these loads, can we exclude this energy use for benchmarking purposes?

We have installed submeters on our building but the utility bill includes energy use from several other buildings located on the same campus. How do we reconcile this during the LEED review process?

When is it possible to exclude up to 10% of the building from EAp2?

What do I do if the number of building occupants, operating hours, or vacant space changes during the performance period?

If you pursue the streamlined path for an Energy Star label, should the performance period for EAc6 match the 12-month time frame of the label?

How do I account for computers with multiple monitors on Portfolio Manager?

How should I treat vacant space on Portfolio Manager?

Our building includes a large laboratory space. Can our project benchmark under the Labs21 program?

We have an international project and the space type is eligible for an Energy Star rating. Can we pursue Case 1 to demonstrate compliance given the recently released alternative compliance paths for international projects?

We have a number of buildings on a single campus that we would like to certify at the same time. Is it possible to benchmark the buildings at the campus level?

View answers »

Forum discussion

EBOM-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Efficiency Performance

Energy Star approach for multiple buildings

I am working on a LEED project that was registered under LEED EB: O&M 2008 that is obtaining one LEED rating for the campus. The LEED site boundary includes the majority of buildings on campus, including a couple lodges, dining facility, offices, and educational facilities. Since multiple buildings cannot be benchmarked as a single facility under the Energy Star Portfolio Manager guidelines, would the best approach to achieving the minimum energy requirements be to apply the Case 2 Calculator Option 1 to each building separately on campus?

3

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 21:24

Hello S W: I can start by offering some basic guidance to this, and we can get more detailed if we need to. Let's break this down to the key issues: 1) Keep in mind that if a given building CAN be scored using Case 1, then it MUST be. Since you mentioned that some of your buildings are offices, they cannot use Case 2 as you're proposing. 2) More generally, I recommend scoring each distinct building in a campus project separately because that's the approach most likely to be approved in the LEED review. Some buildings will use Case 1 and others will use Case 2, just like if they were not on the same campus.

Thu, 06/02/2011 - 18:07

Thanks Mike, That makes sense. The campus is actually a training center so almost all the buildings are mixed use in some way, for example the office facilities also have educational classrooms so its almost at a 50/50 split. In this case do you think I can use the Case 2 calculator and break each building down into the space types that it includes? We are also having difficulty because there is no "Education-University Buildings" space type in the Case 2 calculator. I found a CIR from 7/31/2009 that states the Education K-12 School option can be used instead if the building can be justified as instructional space. So if possible, I would like to break down our Office/Education buildings into "Office" and "K-12 Education." So as long as each building within our LEED boundary meets the requirement, even if its through different options, it should still be acceptable right? So we will basically have separate documentation for each of our buildings on campus. Thanks so much!

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 15:15

S W: This can get tricky, but you're almost on the right track. For each of your mixed-use buildings, think of whether each usage type itself is ratable in ENERGY STAR. The ratable types are listed at this site: http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=eligibility.bus_portfoliomanager_space_types#office In your example, both office and K-12 are ratable types, so that building can (and must) be scored using Case 1. Try that within Portfolio Manager and it should work; no need to use the USGBC's calculator. If that doesn't work then something else is going on here and you can check back in.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.