See all forum discussions about
Subscribe to new posts about Post a new question about

Forum discussion

I don't think we need to

2
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user marabaum
Mara Baum
Partner, Architecture & Sustainability
DIALOG
LEEDuser Premium Member
449 thumbs up

Thu, 04/01/2010 - 16:42

I agree on both counts - that we probably can ignore the "effective date" column, and that it's unclear how we address the many products not explicitly named. Given the intent of the credit, I don't think that it would be acceptable to ignore all paints and coatings not directly mentioned. Anything not clearly defined in the credit language would fall under "other", which is 350 g/L as per SCAQMD 1113.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.