Forum discussion

You absolutely CAN use the

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 03/05/2010 - 02:32

Kath, Thanks a lot for your response. I don't think I was clear of our problem. J R Loring's Washington offfice is our MEP engineer. The CxA for Fundamental commissioning is the engineer from their NewYork office since this is a building less than 50,000 SF area. We like to use the same for enhanced commissioning as well. Is this okay do you think?

Fri, 03/05/2010 - 16:28

I'm not sure. Here's why...In one of our recent LEED reviews, we were told we had used an inappropriate CxA. The reviewer wrote every project must use a "Disinterested party; subcontractor to the A/E; Construction Manager not holding constructor contracts; Independent consultant contracted to Owner; or Owner employee or staff" for Enhanced Cx. I can see how they might question Loring NYC office as being part of D.C. office. I'm sure this has been resolved as an issue but I can't find a direct reference. Sorry. Can anyone help here?

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.