I have been wondering if land that is completely left alone, not watered, without any vegetation other than what one would find on cleared desert land, would count? Basically, to plant vegetation and water would hurt the California drought issue, therefore, maybe just dried out land would meet the criteria? In the Rainy Season (Winter), there would be some minimal growth, but otherwise not much other than dried dirt. This is the natural unmaintained land and what would actually be there, if no one ever added extra plants or watered anyway. This is a long shot of course! Just wondered.
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
AtSite Inc
AtSite1 thumbs up
August 27, 2014 - 11:21 am
You could make the argument that this land is an "ecologically appropriate" feature: "Other ecologically appropriate features that contribute to this credit are natural site elements beyond vegetation that maintain or restore the ecological integrity of the site, including water bodies, exposed rock, unvegetated ground or other features that are part of the historic natural landscape within the region and provide habitat value." Looks like you've got yourself some unvegetated ground there, but it may depend on the level of disturbance.