I have three questions about whole building LCA. I have a client who wants to evaluate the impact of wood vs concrete building construction.
- Just by a quick look at the raw material extraction phase, the impact of concrete construction is higher. On the other hand, by looking at the whole lifecycle assessment from cradle to grave the impact of building with wood might be higher, is this normal? Im keeping the total U value for the building envelope the same in both criteria.
- For the selection of materials, there is a big database available in the software (I’m using Oneclick LCA). The CO2 emissions vary considerably… what is the priority for material selection since we have this huge difference?
- In case of selecting materials from other country, just for calculations, does it really makes sense, since theoretically it is very difficult to get these materials in the country where the project is located…?
Spencer Jarrett
Business DeveloperOne Click LCA
May 30, 2023 - 2:06 pm
Hello Nove,
1. It is difficult to say what is normal. The environmental impact of wood construction can vary widely depending on how/where it was harvested, manufactured, the transport distance, its EOL processing, and other factors that are considered in a WBLCA. It really depends on the specific scenario and the assumptions that are made in the LCA. The same can be said for concrete.
2. The specific impacts of each material and their quantities are the basis for the LCA. So, the selection of materials should be given high priority and be as accurate as possible for the project.
3. It depends on the scenario you are assessing.
Hope this helps!