Forum discussion

NC-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performance

Water Coil Sizing, heating and cooling

Hi all! I have a problem with water coil sizing. I set the following parameters for cooling and heating

 

Coil:Cooling:Water,

   AHU%A%01 AHU Cooling Coil,        ! - Component name

   Cooling Coil,                                ! - Availability schedule

   0.001700,                                    ! - Design Water Volume Flow Rate of Coil (m3/s)

   6.580000,                                    ! - Design Air Flow Rate of Coil (m3/s)

   18.00,                                          ! - Design Inlet Water Temperature (C)

   28.20,                                          ! - Design Inlet Air Temperature (C)

   24.00,                                          ! - Design Outlet Air Temperature (C)

   0.008,                                          ! - Design Inlet Air Humidity Ratio

   0.008,                                          ! - Design Outlet Air Humidity Ratio

 

Coil:Heating:Water,

   AHU_A_01 AHU Heating Coil 1,                                          ! - Component name

   Heating Coil,                                                                     ! - Availability schedule

   autosize,                                                                           ! - U-factor times area value of coil (W/K)

   autosize,                                                                           ! - Max water flow rate of coil (m3/s)

   AHU_A_01 AHU Heating Coil 1 Water Inlet Node,                ! - Water inlet node name

   AHU_A_01 AHU Heating Coil 1 Water Outlet Node,             ! - Water outlet node name

   AHU_A_01 AHU Steam Humidifier Air Outlet Node,             ! - Air inlet node name

   AHU_A_01 AHU Heating Coil 1 Air Outlet Node,                  ! - Air outlet node name

   NominalCapacity,                                                              ! - Coil performance input method

   59500.00,                                                                          ! - Rated capacity (W)

   45,                                                                                    ! - Rated inlet water temperature (C)

   16.8,                                                                                 ! - Rated inlet air temperature (C)

   40,                                                                                    ! - Rated outlet water temperature (C)

   24,                                                                                    ! - Rated outlet air temperature (C)

   0.50;                                                                                  ! - Rated ratio for air and water convection

 

But in the HTML I find this for Cooling:

AHU%A%01 AHU Cooling Coil: Nominal Total Capacity = 119722.30 [W]

 

And this for Heating:

AHU_A_01 AHU Heating Coil 1: Nominal Total Capacity = 138443.99 [W]

 

How is it possible? Where did I make the mistake?

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 03/07/2018 - 17:23

This question is related to the specific software.

Wed, 03/07/2018 - 17:33

Looks like EnergyPlus? You might have better luck here - https://energyplus.net/support 

Thu, 03/08/2018 - 09:33

Thank you Marcus. The software we use is Design Builder. I put correct inputs in Design Builder: the same data reported in technical sheets for coils cooling and coils heating. After annual simulation The Nominal Capacity reported in html outputs in Design Builder is a values greater than value entered in. How it is possible? I have investigated on web, but it seems that it is a problem of software. (We have also called Software house and they told us the same). So I hope that with this explanation USGBC clarifications are ok. But if you have any suggestions please let me know. Thank you so much.

Thu, 03/08/2018 - 14:50

Design Builder runs on the EnergyPlus engine. I have no idea how this is possible. I would recommend that you ask the Energy Plus help desk. The disparity on the heating capacity could potential be a red flag for the reviewer so I would recommend that you find out what is going on before submitting for LEED.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.