I think the Triple Bottom Line assessment (i.e. quantifying the value/impact of the design) would be beneficial in this category for 3 reasosn:

  1. Alignment with USGBC's Strategic Plan: Placing the ESG-Informed Design credit within the Integrative Process category would better align with the USGBC's strategic objectives, fostering a more cohesive approach to sustainability in building design and construction.
  2. Empowerment of Design Teams: By incorporating the ESG-Informed Design credit into the Integrative Process category, design teams would be equipped with the tools necessary to address first-cost hurdles with owners. This shift would enable teams to articulate the business case for sustainable design decisions more effectively, ultimately driving greater adoption of environmentally responsible practices.
  3. Recognition of Building Owner Priorities: Building owners increasingly prioritize the communication of ESG outcomes in their projects. By rewarding this behavior through the inclusion of the ESG-Informed Design credit in the Integrative Process category, the USGBC would incentivize and recognize owners' efforts to promote sustainability within the built environment.

Overall, relocating the ESG-Informed Design credit to the Integrative Process category holds the potential to enhance both the effectiveness and relevance of the LEED certification process.